"Karate Ni Sente Nashi" (There is no First Attack in Karate)

A while back, I was reacquainting myself with a longunaware of danger. However, attacking an
time friend during a weekend get together. We wereunsuspecting victim goes against the very heart of
talking about our families' weekly schedules and IOkinawan Karate, not to mention the laws of all fifty
mentioned that my daughter and I spend a couplestates. The second vulnerable instance is when an
nights a week at karate. My friend, who's always beenindividual is attacking. This, I believe, is the essence of
a bit outspoken, surprised me by asking if I could beatkarate as a martial art.
up the other guys in our group. I told him that wasIn an altercation, an opponent would almost certainly be
tough to say because karate is a defensive art. At theon his or her guard before any physical confrontation
time, I said this without thinking, but I have thought aboutwere to begin. It is very difficult to initiate an attack
this a lot both before and since the conversation.against a wary opponent, even an untrained opponent.
I have had to use karate for real in two instances. InFurthermore, it is even more difficult to initiate an attack
both instances I was completely defensive in posture,against a wary opponent if the aim is to subdue
and in both instances I immediately and without thoughtwithout harming. On the other hand, if the opponent
applied my karate training and was able to subdueinitiates contact, he or she is not concentrating on
both attackers without injury to myself. I have alsodefending themselves, and an opening for a counter
been in other fights, but if I in any way contributed to orshould occur. Once this opening presents itself, the
failed to attempt to avoid the altercation, I did not applykarate-ka may chose the least lethal technique
my karate training. This was not a conscious decision,appropriate and necessary for his or her own
so I'm not exactly sure why. For years I had assumedprotection
it was a moral issue. By being at least partially toThis is why I believe trying to avoid confrontation is
blame for the physical conflict, my subconscioussuch an integral part of karate. When facing an
prevented me from using techniques that could resultaggressor, a non-confrontational attitude should
in injury to the co-instigator. While I do not wish toaccomplish one of two results. Either the aggressor will
underestimate having the moral advantage as a factorrelent finding an unwilling opponent or sense this
in a fight, it has occurred to me there was probablyattitude as weakness. By thinking the victim weak, the
another and much simpler reason as well.aggressor may underestimate his or her opponent.
As karate-ka, we are not normally taught how to beThe first result avoids the physical confrontation
the aggressor. Most forms of practice, with theentirely; the ultimate goal of karate. The second result
possible exception of sparring and some katas, begingains the karate-ka an advantage that will assist in the
with a block or counter to an attack. Even katas thatsuccessful subduing of the aggressor. This also allows
begin with a strike are in response to an attack. Thisthe karate-ka to gain a moral advantage which would
means we spend only a fraction of our time traininghelp to release any inhibitions in using their training
how to successfully initiate contact. This may appearI have often heard the adage "Karate Ni Sente Nashi"
to be an omission in karate training, but I suspect it has(there is no first attack in karate). This saying certainly
evolved for a reason.has a firm foundation in the martial arts for obvious
There are two points in which individuals are mostmoral reasons, but reflection shows that there may be
vulnerable. First is when they are unsuspecting ora less obvious tactical benefit to this philosophy as well.