For Self Defense Is It Necessary To Know How To Kill?

Lets start with a couple of questions:I find it far more dangerous not to know how to kill.
1. In this day and age, what could possibly be theWhen you consider the flip side of that knowledge is
reason to teach someone how to kill another humanthe fact that any time you put your hands on another
with his or her bare hands?human being to inflict violence you have no idea
2. Do I actually advocate instructing clients in this verywhatsoever how that person will respond to the strike.
specific, lethal material?A person built like Arnold Schwarzenegger in his prime
The answer to the first question is that there aremay have a bad heart and your punch to the solar
many reasons why it is essential one get this lethalplexus to 'teach him a lesson' may, in fact, kill him. That
knowledge. The answer to the second question is notis why I stress the difference between ego situations
only do I advocate teaching it but that I absolutelyand life or death threats.
teach it to all my clients.A few years ago you probably heard about the
It is very clear that using violence is appropriate in very'Hockey Dad' trial in Massachusetts. A man ended up
few situations. To use violence for any reason othergoing to jail for manslaughter over an argument with
than injuring a human threat who would otherwisehis son's Hockey coach. By all accounts the smaller
maim, cripple, or kill you is extremely risky.coach was a real jerk and made the kids do some
With proper knowledge of the physiology of theuseless and dangerous training on the ice.
vunerable areas of the human body one canThis 'Hockey Dad' voiced his concern and the verbal
effectively attack any assailant, regardless of size,exchange led to a fight. 'Hockey Dad' ended up killing
strength, or athletic ability.the smaller coach by repeated blows to the head.
So it is inconceivable that one could train a client forIt was not intentional, both men were wrong. But the
self protection yet ignore the subject of killing. If facedone common factor here was this: neither had any
with a life and death struggle you need clear, conciseidea of the effects of those strikes upon the other!
information on how to systematically shut down theBoth families lost their dads that day; one was killed,
other guy's central nervous system(CNS).the other is in jail.
This is especially true for male on female violence,It is my goal with clients to give them all the lethal
which females must treat as a lethal situation. Also anyknowledge necessary so they can make the decision
fighter facing a potentially lethal attack by a larger,on whether or not it is worth the potential legal hassles
stronger or faster human must be able to immediatelyto fight over an ego issue or to instantly be able to
shut down that human's CNS.destroy the assailant's CNS in a life or death threat.
Still, very few instructors teach this direct approach toIt's great to hear feedback I get from clients who have
using violence. Why is this the case? It has been myeasily avoided the 'Hockey Dad' scenarios by having
experience few actually have the skill and expertise tothe clear knowledge of the appropriate use of
do so.violence. I value that feedback as highly as the ones
To hide this deficiency they state legal issues andreceived from those who used the very same
spiritual reasons for not teaching such principles.knowledge to save their lives in a life or death threat.
Yet many of the techniques they show directly resultTruly knowing how to kill another human places total
in potentially lethal outcomes something that is neverresponsibility on the trained individual, makes you a far
pointed out to the client. In fact, most clients go throughbetter citizen and, in my experience, far less likely to
training with no clear knowledge of which strikes anduse violence as an answer to any situation that is not
techniques are lethal and what the impact is on thelife threatening.
human body from these strikes and manipulations.